Device Tree mailing

[Julien Grall]

On 03/03/14 10:45, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall at linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> A device tree ML has been created to discuss about binding specification.
>
> Already subscribed a while ago :)
>
>> As discussed on a previous thread [1], FreeBSD device tree binding doesn't always match bindings used by all the boards. It prevents FreeBSD to boot out-of-box (e.g. without a modified DT).
>
> A situation we’d like to correct. I believe the issues from that thread had been
> corrected (it was a simple bug), and generally we are striving to have the standard
> DTB work correctly. While we may fall short in a couple of areas, those are
> simple bugs that should be highlighted.

I haven't check the FreeBSD for a month now. I saw that Nathan has 
reworked FDT code since this thread, thanks to him.

The bug where FreeBSD were not able to deal with #interrupt-cells > 2 
seems to be fixed (I haven't had time to verify it).

I think the issue on device enumeration from the DT is still there. I 
will have to give a try to be sure.

>> It might be interested to have some people from BSD on this mailing list.
>
> Yes, the more the merrier.
>
> Warner
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2014-January/001974.html
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [Fwd: New mailing lists]
>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:26:57 +0000
>> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell at citrix.com>
>> Organisation: Citrix Systems, Inc.
>> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall at citrix.com>
>>
>> Can you forward this to whoever @ NetBSD you think might be interested?
>
> Is NetBSD going to start using FDT now?

Good question, I think Ian meant FreeBSD here. ;)

-- 
Julien Grall