And now for the actual test... [was: Re: What platform do you use?]
ThomasSkibo at sbcglobal.net
Mon Aug 11 22:22:41 UTC 2014
On 08/10/2014 07:37 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 10:26 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> I’d like to know what platforms people use FreeBSD/arm with, and if you’d have time to test some potentially “break the kernel” sort of changes in the next month?
>> I have the following boards: boatloads of atmel, BBB, and RPI. This covers the at91, imx6 and broadcom directories. I also have a allwinnner board, but I’ve never got it booting FreeBSD. Likewise with a rockchip. I have some marvell gear too, but it is buried deep. This leaves a lot of other boards/SoCs to cover...
> So, anybody wanting to do the testing alluded to in this thread-starting
> message, here's all you need to do:
> - Add "option ARM_DEVICE_MULTIPASS" to your kernel config.
> - Rebuild and install the kernel, boot.
> - Everything should still work.
> The only difference you should notice is that devices load in a
> different order at boot time. Specifically, you'll see all the busses
> listed first, then interrupt controllers, then l2cache, then clocks and
> timers, then all the usual stuff after that.
> There's no immediate benefit or speedup or anything, this is to help
> pave the way for using fdt data that comes with a board or system
> instead of needing our special freebsd dtb files. Right now we count on
> devices loading in the order we list them in our dts source. This is a
> new way of loading things that should ensure critical devices are loaded
> first, even when we can't control the order of things in the fdt data.
> I've tested this on wandboard only so far.
> -- Ian
It works on the Zedboard. I diffed the before and after boot messages
and noticed the driver messages changed order slightly. devinfo -v
returns the exact same output as before.
More information about the freebsd-arm