Compilation for ARM, patches

Anton Shterenlikht mexas at
Sun Aug 3 12:44:36 UTC 2014

>From: Ian Lepore <ian at>
>Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:38:45 -0600
>Sorry it took so long, but I've finally gotten these patches committed,
>as of r269395, thanks for submitting them.  You were right about the
>nested .fnstart being an error.  I learned more about the unwind info
>while working on the c++ exception bugs -- multiple .fnstart without
>a .fnend in between can't be expressed correctly at all, the tools are
>right to complain about that.
>I made some changes to the EENTRY() stuff, if I didn't get it right and
>it needs more changes to compile with your newer binutils, just let me
>know and I'll adjust as needed.
>I also committed the .arch_extension for ti_smc.S, which actually
>required changing our base binutils to recognize .arch_extension (but it
>was worth it, because if we start correcting our code now it will be
>ready when we update our tools in base).
>-- Ian

Just to clarify, is this for clang or for GCC, or both?



More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list