signal 11 after kernel update r247742 -> r248706

[René Ladan]

On 29-03-2013 18:58, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 29 March 2013 09:06, René Ladan <rene at freebsd.org
> <mailto:rene at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>  
>
>     >> I'm at r248509 on my rpi and everything is good; maybe that'll help
>     >> narrow the binary search.
>     > Ok, I'll start looking from there.
>
>     The 'skeleton' unmapped IO commit was r248508, so that one is OK.
>     There seem to be some unmapped IO changes between r248509 and r248706,
>     (e.g. r248510-r248512, r248514-r248522, r248550, r248568-r248569,
>     r248596) but I think it is more related to something closer to
>     userland?
>
>     But the other commits between r248508 and r248706 look OK to me
>     (including r248534 (jilles, SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONLBOCK,
>     MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC))
>
>
> Are you able to continue bisecting those changes?
>
I didn't try r248509 (which is OK for Ian) myself yet, I'll first build
a kernel/world for that (but to be fair I'll first have to downgrade to
r247742 again).

René