arm/155214: [patch] MMC/SD IO slow on Atmel ARM with modern
large SD cards
Bernd Walter
ticso at cicely7.cicely.de
Thu Mar 3 22:04:45 UTC 2011
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 12:51:30PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 17:56, Greg Ansley wrote:
> >On 3/2/11 7:40 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >>The following reply was made to PR arm/155214; it has been noted by
> >>GNATS.
> >>
> >>From: Ian Lepore<freebsd at damnhippie.dyndns.org>
> >>To: ticso at cicely.de
> >>Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
> >>Subject: Re: arm/155214: [patch] MMC/SD IO slow on Atmel ARM with modern
> >> large SD cards
> >>Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:21:09 -0700
> >> I have not tested with 4-bit enabled; I wasn't aware (but in
> >>retrospect
> >> I probably should have assumed) that the hardware bugs are different
> >> with 4-bit enabled. I'm not even sure our hardware design carries
> >>all 4
> >> lines to the card; I'll look at the schematics and if they're
> >>connected
> >> I'll see about testing that mode. (And if they're not I'll see about
> >> having our designers wire up all 4 lines on future designs.)
> >>
> >> I also haven't tested with the SAM9-series, because I don't have that
> >> hardware available. (I hope to convince our hardware designers to
> >> migrate us to SAM9 this year.)
> >>
> >With the current code (prepatch) 4bit mode is known to work at least
> >on the SAM9G20 with kernel option AT91_MCI_HAS_4WIRE. I'll be working
> >on the SAM9G20 in the next few days and I can test the patch on both a
> >RM9200 (1 bit only) and on a couple of SAM9G20 designs with 4bit
> >hardware.
>
> For some ancient history...
>
> The Atmel Linux repo went back and forth on the 4-bit support in
> RM9200. When the SAM9260 was released, they added support there and
> specifically disabled it for the RM9200. When I asked about it, they
> muttered something about silicon bugs. After that, it ping ponged back
> and forth between supported and not for a while. I honestly don't know
> where it settled finally.
Interesting.
I'm not aware of 4-bit silicon bugs, but of course there are boards, which
are 1-bit wired only.
And I'm aware that you need 100k pullup or pulldown to the data wires,
although my first prototype boards worked fine without them.
I don't remember the reason for them.
--
B.Walter <bernd at bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list