[REVIEW] Re: Modernizing calendar(1) (was: svn commit: r365984 - head/usr.bin/calendar/calendars)

[Stefan Esser]

Am 21.10.20 um 09:15 schrieb Stefan Esser:
> Am 21.10.20 um 03:23 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey:
> [...]
>> That's the whole point.  Where do we draw the line?  Given that these
>> holidays interest more people outside the project than in, I'd think
>> that they should all go into the port.  And the whole idea of
>> alternative 3 is that the maintenance should be automatic and
>> external, so updating holidays should no longer be our concern.
> 
> Are we taling about the calendar binary or the calendar files?
> 
> IMHO, the calendar binary could stay in base but be modified to
> scan directories in e.g. /usr/local/share/calendar/ and ports
> could provide these calendar files.

I have created a Phabricator review for the proposed change:

	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26882

This is just an enabler for calendar files in a directory that
can be maintained by means of a port.

A suggested port has been made available for review, too:

	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26883
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20201021/96fee313/attachment.sig>