Retiring in-tree GDB

[Bryan Drewery]

On 10/20/2015 2:50 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 02:25:48PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> 
>> On 10/20/2015 1:36 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> However, I would like to propose that we retire the in-tree GDB for some of
>>> our platforms (namely x86) for 11.  In particular, I think we should default
>>
>> Disabling/removing gdb. Definitely. It is unusable in many cases and the
>> working gdb is just a 'pkg install' away.
>>
>>> to enabling lldb and disabling gdb for platforms that meet the following
>>
>> Why should we include lldb in the base system? It is not needed to build
>> or use the system and we can easily provide one from packages.
>>
>> Arguments about providing a default working system don't work here for
>> me as we don't provide perl, python, valgrind, vim, emacs, X11, etc.  We
>> can provide lldb and gdb on the default DVD though.
>>
>> If we are actually going to "package base" in 11, we should not be
>> adding new things into base that can easily live in ports. Yes, I know
>> lldb is already there but I don't think it should be.
>>
>> Can the same be said for tools such as truss, ktrace or nvi? Sure. The
>> discussion is really "what packages should be installed by default".
>> The answer should be "what all, or most, users _need_" Do most users
>> need a debugger? I don't think so.
> 
> When you need debuger you may don't have way to install it.
> 

How did you get a system?

DVD? 'pkg add /mnt/cd/packages/gdb.txz'
Network? 'pkg install gdb'

Fetching the packages to a USB drive from another system works too using
'pkg fetch -o'.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20151020/28ae4ab2/attachment.bin>