CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch

[Adrian Chadd]

Where's it hiding? All I have seen is the projects/numa branch. This is a
subset of that.

Adrian
 On Jun 1, 2015 8:38 AM, "Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> How does this work release to the branch that Jeff Roberson had for
> numaizing
> the VM system? Can any of that work be carried forward?
>
> Warner
>
>
> > On May 31, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's in a review, and I've addressed most of the feedback:
> >
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559
> >
> > I'd like to get more feedback before I commit this. I'm hoping to
> > commit it next week so I can make a start on pushing numa awareness
> > into KVA allocation and contigmalloc/busdma.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > -adrian
> >
> >
> > On 12 May 2015 at 18:32, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm at the point now where I think this part is done and I'd like to
> >> get it more formally reviewed and ready for commit into -HEAD.
> >>
> >> Here's the branch:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...erikarn:local/adrian_numa_policy
> >>
> >> * added syscalls;
> >> * added vm domain policy and iterators;
> >> * per-process, per-thread and global system policy;
> >> * added numactl - a tool to manipulate, fetch and start processes w/
> policies;;
> >> * added manpages for everything above.
> >>
> >> It's working fine for a handful of people who have been testing it.
> >> I'd like to get some more wider testing and reporting.
> >>
> >> I'd like to wrap this up in a formal phabricator review in the next
> >> few days and kick start it along.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> -adrian
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>