How is MACHINE_ARCH dervived by make? [SOLVED]
Sean Bruno
sbruno at ignoranthack.me
Wed Nov 26 22:05:13 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 13:56 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 13:41 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Nov 26, 2014, at 13:37, Sean Bruno <sbruno at ignoranthack.me> wrote:
> >
> > > I have yet to find the magic bit in the build sys that causes ports to
> > > go off and think that I'm building for amd64. Building on a real amd64
> > > box inside of an emulated jail via qemu and I still am getting tripped
> > > up by something in our system thinking that I want amd64 as the
> > > MACHINE_ARCH.
> >
> > It’s handled in bmake/make. If you need to crossbuild, you’ll probably need to tell make what your MACHINE_ARCH/MACHINE is.
> > Please refer to the manpages for more details.
> > Cheers!
> >
>
> Hrm, man make doesn't bring up the bmake man page (on current). If it
> *did* I would have seen the MACHINE_ARCH comments that allow overrides.
> Odd.
>
> > $ grep -rl MACHINE_ARCH contrib/bmake/ usr.bin/make | grep '\.c$'
> > contrib/bmake/main.c
> > contrib/bmake/arch.c
> > usr.bin/make/main.c
> >
>
> Looking now ... it sort of looks like there is some shell script hackery
> to do this at build time that depends on uname in machine.sh and os.sh
>
> sean
>
> ____________________
Ok, that gave me the clue-bat I needed.
Executing "setenv MACHINE arm; setenv MACHINE_ARCH armv6" was exactly
the little bit of magic I was looking for.
sean
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list