Total confusion over toolchain/xdev behavior
Dimitry Andric
dim at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jul 8 17:37:06 UTC 2014
On 08 Jul 2014, at 18:23, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08 Jul 2014, at 03:56, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> About the rest… Yea, you may be right…. MK_GNUCXX is an odd duck, and that’s
>>>>> likely the problem that should be fixed in a different way. It is really an internal
>>>>> variable that should be set based on the actual compiler type (possibly with an
>>>>> override for the odd-duck pair of clang and libstdc++ which may not be worth
>>>>> supporting). It is telling us we’re doing something horribly wrong and we should listen
>>>>> to that rather than add another compiler-related kludge to the build system. I’ll work
>>>>> on that bit.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps
>>>> http://people.freesbd.org/~imp/patch-queue/86gnucxx
>>>> might be the best way to cope…
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> This would make it impossible to build libstdc++ with clang, and why remove MK_GNUCXX at all[1]?
>>
>> Because it is a silly option that’s mostly an internal knob? We don’t need to support options that trip us up at every turn, and MK_GNUCXX has been doing that since its introduction.
>
> Also, in the current tree it means different things in different places. In some places it says to build libstdc++, in other places it says to build g++ and friends.
This was an oddity introduced by theraven@ in r255321, where he introduced MK_GNUCXX, but I have no idea why he conflated the two. Before this commit, I had a local patch which simply added an option disabling or enabling libstdc++ and libsupc++ (and nothing else). I should have committed that first... :)
In any case, it would be nice to still have the option to enable building libstdc++, whatever the used compiler is.
-Dimitry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20140708/e234225b/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list