Process reapers

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:46:27AM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 01:31, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I could rename p1 to something else, but also short, since LIST_*
> > constructs are long and clumsy.  Might be, s/p1/rp/ ?
> 
> Yes, that works as well. 

Ok, I renamed p1 to reap.

Does anybody have any non-formal comments about patch ?
I would go as far as to say that the implementation details are
really not that critical for the proposal.  I am much more worried
about the API design and its usefullness,