Getting rid of atomic_load_acq_int(&fdp->fd_nfiles)) from fget_unlocked
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Thu Aug 14 16:07:13 UTC 2014
On Saturday, July 12, 2014 11:55:00 pm Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Currently:
> /*
> * Avoid reads reordering and then a first access to the
> * fdp->fd_ofiles table which could result in OOB operation.
> */
> if (fd < 0 || fd >= atomic_load_acq_int(&fdp->fd_nfiles))
> return (EBADF);
>
> However, if we put fd_nfiles and fd_otable into one atomically replaced
> structure the only need to:
> 1. make sure the pointer is read once
> 2. issue a data dependency barrier - this is a noop on all supported
> architectures and we don't even have approprate macro, so doing nothing
> seems fine
>
> The motivation is to boost performance to amortize for seqlock cost, in
> case it hits the tree.
>
> This has no impact on races with capability lookup.
>
> In a microbenchmark of 16 threads reading from the same pipe fd
> immediately returning EAGAIN the numbers are:
> x vanilla-readpipe-run-sum
> + noacq-readpipe-run-sum
> [..]
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 20 13133671 14900364 13893331 13827075 471500.82
> + 20 59479718 59527286 59496714 59499504 13752.968
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> 4.56724e+07 +/- 213483
> 330.312% +/- 1.54395%
>
> There are 3 steps:
> 1. tidy up capsicum to accept fde:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/single-fdtable-read-capsicum.patch
The KASSERT() on the 'fd' being valid was lost from cap_fcntl_check(). Should
probably put that back. However, cap_fcntl_check() is now no longer used.
Instead, you should just rename cap_fcntl_check_fd() to cap_fcntl_check() and
remove the old one.
> 2. add __READ_ONCE:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/read-once.patch
> 3. put stuff into one structure:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/filedescenttable.patch
Anotehr name besides the one suggested by Konstantin could just be 'struct
filetable'. Even shorter while not having abbreviations. Also, I think you
can leave the comment in 'struct filedesc' as just 'open files' in that case.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list