jail configuration

Teske, Devin Devin.Teske at fisglobal.com
Mon Sep 16 18:59:43 UTC 2013


On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Jamie Gritton wrote:

> On 09/16/13 11:33, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>> Jamie Gritton <jamie at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>> Yes, I've let jail startup go for too long - I really meant to put it in
>>> for 10.0 but the recent slush kind of surprised me (which means I'm just
>>> not keeping up). After 10 splits off, it's time to just do it.
>> 
>> How about we just ask agree on a patch, then ask re@?
> 
> If they're good for it, I am. But if it's to go in for 10, I'd think
> that update script would need to be a part of it.
> 
> On the rc script itself, jail(8) has the ability to take multiple jails
> on the command line and start them all. I'd prefer to go that route
> rather than looping through the jails in the shell, since it allows for
> jail's support of dependencies and parallel startup.
> 

In the patch DES submitted, I don't see why one couldn't use an
fnmatch(3) expression as the jail name.

In fact, his start routine uses a default jail name of '*'
-- 
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list