mount(1) without /etc/fstab

Chris Rees crees at bayofrum.net
Wed Jul 24 10:48:58 UTC 2013


On 24 Jul 2013, at 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:

> 
> I found behavior of mount(1) rather annoying when there is no /etc/fstab.
> Some systems legitimately do not need (anything in) /etc/fstab, so all of that
> complaining is in vain.
> 
> Should mount(1) be silenced in this case?
> Or should we have and install an empty etc/fstab just to please mount(1)?

I think mount should be silenced.  This is a problem that has come up in a couple of ports that complain-- the package building jails don't have fstabs, and we have to work around that.

Chris
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list