mount(1) without /etc/fstab
Chris Rees
crees at bayofrum.net
Wed Jul 24 10:48:58 UTC 2013
On 24 Jul 2013, at 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I found behavior of mount(1) rather annoying when there is no /etc/fstab.
> Some systems legitimately do not need (anything in) /etc/fstab, so all of that
> complaining is in vain.
>
> Should mount(1) be silenced in this case?
> Or should we have and install an empty etc/fstab just to please mount(1)?
I think mount should be silenced. This is a problem that has come up in a couple of ports that complain-- the package building jails don't have fstabs, and we have to work around that.
Chris
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list