libutil in Debian
Robert Millan
rmh at freebsd.org
Thu Jul 11 08:42:20 UTC 2013
2013/7/9 Justin Hibbits <jhibbits at freebsd.org>:
> I was thinking more in terms of adding the functions to the debian local
> patch set. I don't know how intrusive it would be, but it may be worth
> looking into.
You may not believe this, but it is even worse. Can you believe they
even refused to add trivial syscall stubs, such as nlm_syscall()? They
say this "belongs elsewhere" even though it's -lc in FreeBSD like most
(all?) syscall stubs.
Look at the kind of workarounds we have to endure:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/glibc-bsd/trunk/freebsd-utils/debian/patches/036_nfs_glibc.diff?revision=4047&view=markup
Heck, even the trivial update to <sys/queue.h>, which was *already* of
BSD origin since ancient times, was restricted to only apply on our
port, so that the new macros (e.g. LIST_FOREACH_SAFE) were not
available on Debian GNU/Linux.
I'm sorry, I really appreciate your intent but I think there's zero
chance of this working through Debian patchset to Glibc.
--
Robert Millan
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list