Proposal: Unify printing the function name in panic messages()

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 11:24:21 UTC 2013


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> wrote:

> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com> writes:
> > During 1980 years we were using a Burroughs 6700 main frame.  Its
> > Fortran compiler produced code was generating a call stack trace on
> > run time errors [...]  A similar structure may be used for FreeBSD
> > parts generated during compilation when a compiler switch is set.
>
> You mean like we've been doing the last 20 years?
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
>


My intention was to say a message like the following :

In line < number > in routine < name > the error < name of error > has
occurred
called from line < number >  of routine < name > ,
.
.
.
called from line < number >  of routine < name > .

where lines

"called from line < number >  of routine < name >"

may be in any convenient format ( not in hexadecimal addresses ) .


I am not seeing any such messages when an error occurs .

In "Witness" mode , a list is displayed by hexadecimal addresses .

If you mean this feature , I am not intending this feature .


My intention was to mean in "Default" mode , not in "Debug" mode , to
generate such messages
irrespective of debug mode is specified or not .


Thank you very much .


Mehmet Erol Sanliturk


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list