considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture
kpaasial at gmail.com
Mon Apr 1 05:48:28 UTC 2013
I think the only ones who are going to object are the users of embedded
hardware. Some of them are still using CPUs that are only i586 equivalent.
Personally I support the notion.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 architecture in FreeBSD.
> Computers are getting faster, but also more memory intensive. I
> can not find a laptop with less than 4 or 8 GB of RAM. Modern
> browsers, such as Firefox, require a 64bit architecture and 8GB of
> RAM. A 32 bit platform is not enough now a days on systems with
> more than 4 GB of RAM. A 32 bit core now is like 640K of RAM in
> the 1990s. Even in the embedded world ARM is going 64 bit with
> Secondly, the i386 port is unmaintained. Very few developers run
> it, so it doesn't get the testing it deserves. Almost every user
> post or bug report I see from a x86 compatible processor is running
> amd64. When was the last time you booted i386 outside a virtual
> machine? Often times the build works for amd64 but fails for i386.
> Finally, others are dropping support for i386. Windows Server 2008
> is 64 bit only, OSX Mountain Lion (10.8) is 64-bit only. Users
> and downstream vendors no longer care about preserving ancient
> I hope this email is enough to convince you that on this date we
> should drop support for the i386 architecture for 10.0 to tier 2
> and replace it with the ARM architecture as Tier 1.
> Eitan Adler
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-arch