dep-trace v. tsort (mac ports depends support)
John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
johnandsara2 at cox.net
Fri Mar 2 17:28:58 UTC 2012
Hi,
BSD and Apple needs tsort(1) for portage still I believe.
Topological sorting isn't quite right packaging.
Please see: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dep-trace
It is a "drop-in" replacement (operates like a /bin/tsort) but is right for pkg depends
(ie, for portage: you need to dl source, order of compile may be required, sometimes gets missing
message or "loop in depends" message when attempting to compile and install pkg)
I'm a debian user but i wish I had a bsd machine :) So i do not know allot of BSD maintainer /
mailing list specifics. Please give me a handicap there !
Thanks and thanks again,
John
p.s.
(dep-trace itself has no depends (a /bin), has improvements, and is "more hackable" than tsort as to
coding new ordering rules against lists - which in tsort "loop detected attempting to recover" is
not as easy i feel.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list