Sujit K M kmsujit at
Thu May 28 03:39:32 UTC 2009

These are posix unix standards that you are going to be implementing.
So if you are talking of only taking the interfaces, why is there any need
to have objections.

By the way these are a part of specification that austin group maintains

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Zachary Loafman <zml at> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:01:26AM +0530, Sujit K M wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Zachary Loafman <zml at> wrote:
>> >
>> > (see settid and setgroups1)
>> How about the licensing. Darwin was open source under Apple's public
>> license, but no longer. Or is it Mach you are taking about?
> I'm not proposing porting the code directly, I'm merely asking whether
> the API and associated semantics are acceptable. It would be fairly
> straightforward for us to write a unit test that could run on both
> FreeBSD and OS X after this exercise.
> --
> Zach Loafman | Staff Engineer | Isilon Systems

More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list