[PATCH] VFS KPI/API versioning

Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net
Sat Aug 29 14:25:10 UTC 2009

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 04:04:55AM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Something that concerned me is also the mis-usage of the VFS_VERSION
> macro, which can be easilly used at compile time in order to determine
> if a feature is present or not. Basically, I have no idea by when it
> doesn't get updated and if it has ever been checked in our codes. It
> seems to use a random number as the start count, while it could have
> been handled differently. Maybe it would be the case to start taking
> care of that too, which can be an interesting tool.

Quite offtopic, just a note about the "random number as the start count"
part - it's not exactly random; take a "fgrep 1966" to calendar.freebsd ;)


Peter Pentchev	roam at ringlet.net    roam at space.bg    roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This would easier understand fewer had omitted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20090829/337d82a2/attachment.pgp

More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list