pax in /rescue

[Ken Smith]

On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 22:40 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in
> /rescue?

JFYI - despite the cpio/sysinstall issues apparently being fixed I'm
still planning to switch sysinstall over to using tar.  I know that's
not what you're "directly" asking about but it's at least "remotely
related" depending on peoples' feelings about which of the two should be
removed if the answer to your question is "No".

-- 
                                                Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith at cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20080907/63a174d5/attachment.pgp