Disposal of a misleading M_TRYWAIT

Ruslan Ermilov ru at freebsd.org
Sun Mar 23 09:08:34 UTC 2008


On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:01:23PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> We made a decision a while back to not use malloc flags for mbuf routine 
> arguments.

While I can see the point in this (if we ever change the
mbuf allocator from UMA to something else), like I said
in my email, a lot of code already uses malloc flags for
this.

> There are even assertions to verify it.

I think this was OBE, now mbuf.h says:

: /*
:  * Flags specifying how an allocation should be made.
:  *
:  * The flag to use is as follows:
:  * - M_DONTWAIT or M_NOWAIT from an interrupt handler to not block allocation.
:  * - M_WAIT or M_WAITOK from wherever it is safe to block.
:  *
:  * M_DONTWAIT/M_NOWAIT means that we will not block the thread explicitly and
:  * if we cannot allocate immediately we may return NULL, whereas
:  * M_WAIT/M_WAITOK means that if we cannot allocate resources we
:  * will block until they are available, and thus never return NULL.
:  *
:  * XXX Eventually just phase this out to use M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT.
:  */
: #define MBTOM(how)      (how)
: #define M_DONTWAIT      M_NOWAIT
: #define M_TRYWAIT       M_WAITOK
: #define M_WAIT          M_WAITOK


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list