Power-Mgt (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/cpufreq est.c )
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 18 18:26:12 UTC 2008
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <47DED21C.4070108 at FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway writes:
>
>> I think this is a great idea, but one of the big problems is probably going
>> to be dealing with hardware quirks. e.g. we can't even enable powerd by
>> default because e.g. acpi_throttle hangs on some systems. It might be
>> tricky to get power management to the stage where it works for everyone and
>> can be done automatically.
>
> I'd expect that this will improve over time, just like all other
> technologies from ISA to PCI bus implementations did.
>
> But yes, it will take time & effort, but given the current
> cleantech/greentech buzz, I think we'd better get moving.
I know we've talked about this, but I'll mention it for the benefits of the
mailing list: one of the things that makes performance an "easy" target is
that there are easy-to-gather metrics. Those metrics may require knowledge of
statistics and a lifetime of experience to interpret correctly, but they are
still numbers that are easily generated and compared. To drive work in power
management, we would benefit from having similarly accessible metrics. Are
there any decent documents describing how to do power use measurement, and are
there any (relatively) accessible tools for doing it with? For example, on
notebooks, can we sample an ACPI value before/after a benchmark, or do we
really need to hook something up to the power supply in order to get a useful
number?
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list