RFC: Removing file(1)+libmagic(3) from the base system

Alfred Perlstein alfred at freebsd.org
Wed May 23 19:58:32 UTC 2007


* Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org> [070523 11:05] wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Colin Percival wrote:
> 
> >FreeBSD architects and file(1) maintainer,
> >
> >I'd like to remove file(1) and libmagic(3) from the FreeBSD base system
> >for the following reasons:
> >1. I don't see it as being a necessary component of a UNIX-like operating
> >system.
> >2. It's available in the ports tree.
> >3. Due to its nature as a program which parses multiple data formats, it
> >poses an unusually high risk of having security problems in the future
> >(cf. ethereal/wireshark).
> >
> >The one redeeming feature of file/libmagic as far as security is concerned
> >is that it doesn't act as a daemon, i.e., other code or user intervention
> >is required for an attacker to exploit security issues.  This is why I'm
> >asking here rather than wielding the "Security Officer can veto code which
> >he doesn't like" stick. :-)
> >
> >Can anyone make a strong argument for keeping this code in the base system?
> 
> Yes, because other OS's have it (file) in their base, and because
> it is a POSIX-defined utility.  Please consider this a strong no.

I agree with Daniel.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list