netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found

Bruce M Simpson bms at spc.org
Thu Mar 16 02:52:58 UTC 2006


On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> I'm all for this removal. The only two reasons for carrying this around is 
> that it supports CLIP over SVCs and that the driver for the IDT77211 chips 
> is HARP-only. I have half of an ngatm driver for these chips and sent them 
> out two at least two people during the last two years, but never heard 
> back. I have also code for CLIP over SVCs but due to ENOTIME was not yet 
> able to make this commit ready. If anybody knows somebody who could finish 
> the driver it would be great. The CLIP stuff is not so critical - almost 
> all people use PVCs only.

I am one such guilty party. Sadly my time has been completely consumed.
I second the removal of netatm.

BMS


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list