netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found
Bruce M Simpson
bms at spc.org
Thu Mar 16 02:52:58 UTC 2006
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> I'm all for this removal. The only two reasons for carrying this around is
> that it supports CLIP over SVCs and that the driver for the IDT77211 chips
> is HARP-only. I have half of an ngatm driver for these chips and sent them
> out two at least two people during the last two years, but never heard
> back. I have also code for CLIP over SVCs but due to ENOTIME was not yet
> able to make this commit ready. If anybody knows somebody who could finish
> the driver it would be great. The CLIP stuff is not so critical - almost
> all people use PVCs only.
I am one such guilty party. Sadly my time has been completely consumed.
I second the removal of netatm.
BMS
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list