[CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete"

Ceri Davies ceri at submonkey.net
Fri Sep 23 07:10:20 PDT 2005


On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:05:41PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:56:49PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > > Any objections?
> > 
> > Any benefit?  What's the rationale?
> 
> Convenience.

I don't get it, though.  I have FreeBSD, Solaris and Digital UNIX systems
here and none of them support "del".  What does?

Ceri
-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050923/370c78c9/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list