/usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap

[Xin LI]

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:49:53AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
[snip]
> I think that portsnap is a very good feature and I'm ready to tout it
> for the 6.0 release.  The technical problems, such as they are, are

Maybe we should add some sysinstall(8) hooks to enable portsnap within
it? (If this is considered I would say I am volunteering to do that).
Another handy application I would want to see in the base system is
portaudit, as it audits vulnerabilities in the base system as well.
Will this be considered?

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI <delphij frontfree net>	http://www.delphij.net/
See complete headers for GPG key and other information.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050808/bec50108/attachment.bin