Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
    Karim Fodil-Lemelin 
    kfl at xiphos.ca
       
    Fri Nov  5 08:08:44 PST 2004
    
    
  
Our product is a TCP/IP accelerator for satellite communications please 
see http://www.xiplink.com/technology/xiplink_technology-datasheet.html. 
Also, please see http://www.scps.org/scps/ for an explanation of our 
Transport layer implementation. BTW, The marketing dep has renamed T/TCP 
to fast start and we actually made some modifications to FreeBSD's T/TCP 
but the rfc1644 principles are the same.
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>    I am jumping in here, was too busy to read the list for the last 2 
>> weeks,  so please excuse my intrusion. We are using T/TCP in our 
>> product line and are very happy with the performance gain. Could you 
>> tell me what is the rational for removing T/TCP 
>> (security/performances/code complexity, etc ..) from FreeBSD?
>>
>> Again, sorry for being a bit off topic here. 
>
>
>
> what a pitty you didn't notice while it was under discussion: :-(
Yes It is although we are very flexible and so a replacement might be as 
good if not better then what we have now. Especially from a code and 
security perspective. We have always appreciated BSD Engineering process 
and I believe that until we get to see FreeBSD 6.x STABLE we will be 
more then ready.
>
>
> We couldn't find anyone using it...
>
> what is your product?
>
>
>
-- 
Karim Fodil-Lemelin
Lead Programmer
Xiphos Technologies Inc.
(514) 848-9640 x223
(514) 848-9644 fax
www.xiplink.com
--------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material.  If you have
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you.
    
    
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list