per-device sysctls

Julian Elischer julian at elischer.org
Thu Feb 26 12:46:18 PST 2004



On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <3045.1077827869 at critter.freebsd.dk>
>             "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> : In message <20040226.125904.08946359.imp at bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" =
writes:
> : >In message: <xzp8yipk4gh.fsf at dwp.des.no>
> : >            des at des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
> : >: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> : >: > Dag-Erling =3D?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D writes:
> : >: > > "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> : >: > > > That is a good reason to transitioning to this, so long as we =
can come
> : >: > > > up with a good way to represent detached nodes.
> : >: > > As long as they have a device_t, it should be a piece of cake.
> : >: > Having a device_t is a property of having hardware, not of being a
> : >: > device driver.
> : >:=20
> : >: I believe that by "detached nodes", Warner means hardware that does
> : >: not have a driver.
> : >
> : >They have a device_t, however.  All nodes in the tree have a device_t
> : >(kind of by definition). Not all nodes in the tree have a devclass
> : >associated with their device_t (eg, not all devices are attached).
> : >this is why you'll see lots of 'unknown' nodes in the devinfo output.
> :=20
> : GEOM, NETGRAPH pty, tun, tap, nmdm and similar have no newbus
> : infestation and there would have to really good reasons to infest them.

Well netgraph has been using net.graph for a while
but it would be nice to have at least a convention as to where things
like this might go..=20

>=20
> If they want to use this mechanism, they need to use the mechanism.
> I'm cool with them not using this mechanism, but I don't think we
> should kludge it to allow for them to use it.  That's what I'm
> saying...  This is a newbus only mechanism and let's not get bogged
> down in accomidatnig non-newbus things until we have the newbus parts
> of it working.
>=20
> Warner
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>=20



More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list