`Hiding' libc symbols
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
des at ofug.org
Mon May 5 13:25:59 PDT 2003
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> So, I advocate hiding all symbols in libc by default. The Real World
> doesn't seem to care whether the symbols are defined by any standard or
> not.
I'm with you, but I would also like to point out that there is a small
number of ports which will require changes: ports like electricfence,
boehm-gc and others that rely at least in part on replacing libc's
malloc(), calloc(), realloc() and free().
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des at ofug.org
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list