Things to remove from /rescue

Luigi Rizzo rizzo at icir.org
Thu Jul 17 01:50:53 PDT 2003


On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:43:33AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote this message on Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:08 -0700:
> > - ipfw & natd & ipf & ipfs & ipfstat & ipmon & ipnan, why would one needs
> >   these?  /rescue is to fix a borked /, not replace PicoBSD.
> 
> ipfw I can see as useful.  If you have a kernel that defaults to closed,
> and you need to access the network, then this is a problem.  If we had

actually, this is trivial to fix:

	sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0

> a loader tunable to make a closed firewall open, then this wouldn't be

why does this need to be a loader tunable at all and not just an
ordinary sysctl ?  Just having the rights to issue the ipfw
setsockopt() suffices to add a rule and effectively change the
default behaviour.  And this is (in terms of permissions) no different
from issuing a sysctl.

	cheers
	luigi


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list