www/p5-libapreq2: libtool fix, strip libs, pkg-plist followup, p5-fix

[Kurt Jaeger]

Hello,

> > Back to my proposed change for www/libapreq2 and this question:
> > 
> >>> Would it be more useful to make the slave port (p5-libapreq2)
> >>> a seperate port depending on the other ?
> > 
> > Looking at the pkg-plist and Makefile mess: Is it really useful
> > to have this master/slave port or should I split and depend on libapreq2 ?

Attached are two diffs for both ports that seperate them.

> running a short grep over the tree shows there are only two libapreq2 consumers
> - www/mod_amazon_proxy
> - www/p5-libapreq2
> 
> but eleven p5-libapreq consumers
> - net-mgmt/netdisco
> - net-mgmt/netdot
> - www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib
> - www/p5-Apache-Gallery
> - www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl
> - www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache
> - www/p5-HTML-Mason
> - www/p5-Maypole
> - www/rt38
> - www/rt40.cpan
> - www/rt42.cpan

I ran a bulk poudriere run with this:

www/mod_amazon_proxy
net-mgmt/netdisco
net-mgmt/netdot
www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib
www/p5-Apache-Gallery
www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl
www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache
www/p5-HTML-Mason
www/p5-Maypole
www/rt38
www/rt40
www/rt42

and DEFAULT_VERSIONS=perl5=5.20 apache=2.2

without problems on 10amd64 and 91amd64.

Attached are the two diffs, please comment, and if it's OK, please
approve.

I'll also update 191161 for testing.

-- 
pi at FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                          6 years to go !