patch for is ready for review ...

Philip M. Gollucci pgollucci at
Wed Mar 23 03:33:15 UTC 2011

On 3/22/2011 3:46 PM, Olli Hauer wrote:
> a first local exp-run was nearly 100% success. A hand full
> ports which need some fixing, special if they are in master
> slave combination and have both times USE_APACHE?=/= ab+
> defined.
> For example www/mod_jk (1.3+) and www/mod_jk-ap2 (2.0+)
> Both times the preferred apache (2.2) was chosen now, but
> this is easy to fix.
Yeah, thats not my favorite port.

> Do you already have an apache 2.3/2.4 port for testing available?
> I suspect there are some candidates which have defined
> USE_APACHE?=/= ab+ which cannot be build with 2.3/2.4.
> I will then run the next local exp-run to identify these ports.
I don't think we should worry about this at all until after the 2.2 switch.

1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin,                 Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

More information about the freebsd-apache mailing list