question about PR: ports/147009: Mk/ [patch] default to www/apache22

Philip M. Gollucci pgollucci at
Fri Jan 7 19:55:38 UTC 2011

On 01/07/11 19:35, Olli Hauer wrote:
> No, I think the fail is valid, since this was the second test case,
> where I defined *"APACHE_PORT= www/apache22"* in /etc/make.conf!
You know come to think of it, if you have APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 (now)
in /etc/make.conf it does fail it it doesn't match.  Thats b/c
www/apache* conflict with each other so thats valid.

Looks like I eat my previous words.

I think one addition might be useful near the top of


lower in your patch reuse that variable.

The next goal after this and after 24 is ga would be to bump the default
version sometime near next january I'd think.

1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin,                 Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-apache mailing list