amd64/170351: [patch] amd64: 64-bit process can't always get
kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 17:40:10 UTC 2012
The following reply was made to PR amd64/170351; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com>
To: Ming Qiao <mqiao at juniper.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amd64/170351: [patch] amd64: 64-bit process can't always get unlimited rlimit
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:39:23 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:35:20PM +0000, Ming Qiao wrote:
> >Number: 170351
> >Category: amd64
> >Synopsis: [patch] amd64: 64-bit process can't always get unlimited=
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: non-critical
> >Priority: low
> >Responsible: freebsd-amd64
> >State: open
> >Quarter: =20
> >Keywords: =20
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: current-users
> >Arrival-Date: Fri Aug 03 15:40:08 UTC 2012
> >Originator: Ming Qiao
> >Release: FreeBSD 9.0-RC2
> Juniper Networks
> FreeBSD neys 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Thu Jul 26 01:27:46 UTC 2012
> root at neys:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> On the amd64 platform, if a 32-bit process ever manually set its rlimit,
> none of its 64-bit child or offspring will be able to get the full 64-bit
> rlimit anymore, even if they explicitly set the limit to unlimited.
> Note that for the sake of simplicity, only datasize limit is referred
> in this report. But the same logic applies to all other memory segment
> (i.e. stacksize, etc.).
> Take the following scenario as an example:
> 1) Let's say we have a 32-bit process p1 whose hard limit is set to 500MB=
> calling setrlimit().
> 2) p1 then exec another 32-bit process p2.
> 3) p2 set its hard limit to unlimited by calling setrlimit().
> 4) p2 exec a 64-bit process p3.
> 5) check the hard limit of p3, we can see that it only has 3GB (value of
> ia32_maxdsiz) instead of 32GB which is the global kernel limit (value of
> maxdsiz) for a 64-bit process.
> The root cause is that on step 3, p2 didn't actually set its limit to
> the correct value when calling setrlimit(). Instead the limit is set to
> ia32_maxdsiz since ia32_fixlimit() is called in kern_proc_setrlimit().
> There are 3 test programs attached in this report: 32_p1.c, 32_p2.c, and
> 64_p3.c. They can be used to reproduce the problem.
> 1) Compile 32_p1.c and 32_p2.c into 32-bit binaries. Compile 64_p3.c into
> 64-bit binary.
> 2) Put all 3 binaries into the same directory on a machine running FreeBSD
> amd64 version.
> 3) Run 32_p1 which will exec 32_p2 and 64_p3. The output of 64_p3 will sh=
> its limit is capped at ia32_maxdsiz.
> The proposed fix is to change kern_proc_setrlimit() so that sv_fixlimit()
> will not be called if the caller wants to set the new limit to RLIM_INFIN=
> Please refer to the attached diff file for the proposed fix.
The 'fix' is wrong and does not address the issue.
Instead, it uses some arbitrary properties of the scenario you considered
and adapts kernel code to suit your scenario. Your deny the correction
of the infinity limit, I do not see how it can be right.
The problem you described is architectural. By design, Unix resource
limits cannot be increased after they were decreased, except by root.
In your scenario, the limits were decreased by mere fact of running the
32bit process which have lower 'infinity' limits then 64bit processes.
That said, I see two possible solutions.
First is to manually set compat.ia32.max* sysctls to 0. Then you get
desired behaviour for 64bit processes execed from 32bit, it seems.
It does not require code change. Since you are fine with denying fix
for infinity, this setting gives the same effect as the patch.
Second approach (which is essentially a correction to your approach
from fix.diff) is to track the fact that corresponding rlimits are set
to 'ABI infinity', in some per-struct rlimit flag. Then, get/setrlimit
should first test the 'ABI infinity' flag and behave as if rlimit is set
to infinity for current bitness even if the actual value of rlimit is
not infinity. Flag is set when rlimit is set to infinity by current ABI.
The second approach would provide 'correct' fix, but it is not trivial
amount of work for very rare situation (execing 64bit process from 32bit),
and current behaviour of inheriting 32bit limits may be argued as right.
If you want, feel free to develop such patch, I will review and commit it,
but I do not want to spend efforts on developing it myself ATM.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-amd64