[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 04:23:02PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Wouldn't it then make sense just to build a shared libdisk? Is there a 
> > reason not to have one?
> > 
> Here's the original reason.  I'm not sure if it still holds.  peter@ and
> phk@ Cc:ed.
> 
> : RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libdisk/Makefile,v
> : Working file: Makefile
> : head: 1.44
> : branch:
> : locks: strict
> : access list:
> : keyword substitution: kv
> : total revisions: 65;    selected revisions: 1
> : description:
> : ----------------------------
> : revision 1.12
> : date: 1996/03/17 19:02:07;  author: peter;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -0
> : Repository copy src/release/libdisk to src/lib/libdisk as per recent
> : discussion on -core about disk partitioning tools etc.
> : 
> : Add NOPIC=yes to Makefile to prevent any possibility of version mismatch
> : because of the potential grave consequences. (as suggested by phk)
> : 
> : Note that this is also on RELENG_2_1_0, since the sysinstall stuff is
> : hopefully going to remain in sync.
> 
As a safe measure, we can build and install a special PIC archive,
similar to libc_pic.a and libgcc_pic.a, and use it here.  This is
all in an assumption that it's still unsafe to produce the libdisk.so.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20060111/37b9e3f3/attachment.bin