PC Card subpart to R3000 thread

[Coleman Kane]

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:13:11 -0700 (MST), Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> 
> There are a number of issues relating to it, which makes it hard to
> solve generically (well, one could always write 255 as the subbus
> number, but that has some rather severe performance implications...
> 
> Warner
> 

How do we keep track of the busses now? What considerations must be
taken into account regarding setting the numbering this subordinate
bus number? In the patch code it seems that it is setting this
register to the same value as the bus number (10). You are stating
that it can be set to any number (PCIR_SUBBUS_1 that is)?

--
coleman