[ru@FreeBSD.org: install32]

David O'Brien obrien at FreeBSD.org
Wed Dec 7 15:16:05 PST 2005

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:49:39AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Forwarding this to the list since Peter doesn't reply.  If you
> have an opinion on the subject, please reply.
> >     .                    Makefile.inc1 
> >     share/mk             bsd.lib.mk bsd.prog.mk 
> >   Log:
> >   Add the NO_INCS knob to bsd.prog.mk and bsd.lib.mk to not include
> >   bsd.incs.mk, and use it when installing 32-bit compat libraries
> >   on amd64.  This causes it to *not* overwrite native headers with
> >   i386 versions, which was the case with <fenv.h> and <vgl.h>.
> This commit fixes a breakage but also raises the following question.
> If we don't install headers, do we need anything except 32-bit rtld
> and shared libraries?  Currently, we also install .a libraries, .o
> objects, and some data files.

At the moment we don't support building 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit host.
So we don't want .a's and .o's installed.

-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?

More information about the freebsd-amd64 mailing list