freebsd i386 on amd64 hardware?
rob2 at pythonemproject.com
Mon Sep 27 08:45:41 PDT 2004
Joseph Fenton wrote:
> Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra wrote:
>> Bearing in mind that I don't work for AMD, my understanding is that
>> AMD has always planned on three sockets for the Athlon64 - 754 (single
>> channel), originally because it can be put on a 5-layer PCB. Socket
>> 940 for Opterons for dual channel, but requiring a 6-layer PCB. And
>> Socket 939 because that one less pin allows for 5-layer PCBs and dual
> The 754 socket (one HT port and single-channel mem) was destined for
> laptops. The 940 (three HT ports and dual-channel mem) needs the extra
> layers for proper operation. The 939 keeps the dual-channel, but replaces
> two of the HT ports with extra power and ground pins. All the extra power
> and ground pins means less current surge and therefore needs fewer layers.
> Making it one pin less keeps you from accidentally sticking it in the wrong
> freebsd-amd64 at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Thanks guys for the clarification. Rob.
More information about the freebsd-amd64