Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux/AMD64 Vs.
brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Thu May 20 11:05:35 PDT 2004
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:39:01AM -0700, mike wrote:
> i don't know if this is any idea - but why isnt something like
> linuxthreads ported to amd64? i would think with the 64-bit architecture,
> it could be even better than the i386 version.
> again, i am threading-retarded, so if getting linuxthreads working on
> freebsd 5.x on AMD64 is "not appropriate" because freebsd 5.x is supposed
> to have it's own better threading library now, then just ignore me; but it
> seems like linuxthreads has always been the fastest implementation on
> freebsd. i'd be willing to put $$ towards accelerating the effort to get
> mysql performance on freebsd 5.x AMD64 better. i don't know what the best
> setup is, but whatever needs to be done and a way to patch/reproduce it.
With libpthread and libthr, the linuxthreads port should be redundent.
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/attachments/20040520/b4ce362a/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-amd64