FreeBSD has a politics problem
rroot at rootautomation.com
Sun Mar 4 01:55:27 UTC 2018
If politics is when a community had standards it operated by but it showed favoritism not disciplining it's members it thought were more important and allowed them to harass others until they either left or could be accused of breaking not it's rules at time of conflict but this new one they have much more than a political problem. They have a legal problem. They don't own the rights to it's code anymore.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Conrad Meyer <cem at freebsd.org> Date: 3/3/18 3:25 PM (GMT-08:00) To: John Darrah <timmcgrawfan at protonmail.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy at freebsd.org, freebsd-current at freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has a politics problem
A good portion of your original email happens to be inaccurate or
misleading. In the spirit of good faith discussion, I'm going to
assume you're just accidentally misinformed, and not willfully
misrepresenting things. So, some corrections and clarifications
If you have further questions about the code of conduct, I suggest
reaching out to the drafting committee or core directly. They're nice
people, they don't bite, and they're happy to help clarify intent and
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 2:30 PM, John Darrah <timmcgrawfan at protonmail.com> wrote:
> FreeBSD recently introduced an updated Code of Conduct that developers and
> members must adhere to. There has been much backlash online about it and
> about introducing identity politics into a technical OS project in general.
> The Code of Conduct was adopted
In part, with editorial review and modification by a committee of
conscientious project members.
> from the "Geek Feminism" wiki's version,
> which claims (among other things) that racism against whites doesn't exist,
This claim is factually erroneous. The Geek Feminism example
anti-harassment policy simply makes no such claim.
(Furthermore, criticizing the Geek Feminism document is wholly
off-topic for FreeBSD. Our code of conduct is not identical to GF's
example policy. The only conduct document relevant to FreeBSD is the
one at https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html .)
> sexism against men doesn't exist,
This claim is also objectively absent from the plain language of
> and that certain protected classes of
> people should not be criticised.
Again, this hysterical claim comes from blue sky.
> A number of developers, particularly benno@, phk@ and des@, have used racist
> and sexist remarks
Again, this is a claim made without any evidence. I've briefly
re-skimmed the developers discussion on this topic and don't see any
examples. (And, this accusation is so far outside of Benno's demeanor
as to be completely laughable.) phk@ and des@ have used less
conciliatory language but I still do not see any sexist or racist
> against those criticising the far-reaching project policy
> change, saying that the concerns about the policy essentially boil down to
> "white male privilege" and being "on the wrong side of history".
They're entitled to their opinions, as you are. Note that neither
des@ nor phk@ sit on or represent the Core team.
> Other developers expressed concern about the policy being thrown upon them
> with no discussion or debate, as well as The FreeBSD Foundation's choice
> to pay an outside person (with donations from the users) to work on the
> Code of Conduct's enforcement.
The Foundation chooses how to spend donation dollars at its sole
discretion. That's the deal with 501(c)(3) charities. If you want to
pick and choose how your donated dollars are spent, Linux Foundation
is a 501(c)(6).
> Said person identifies as a feminist.
We don't object to contribution from people who identify as
Republican, Catholic, or Pastafarian. Why do you think someone who
identifies as a feminist is incapable of doing a good job advising the
> Mods on BSD and FreeBSD-related subreddits are censoring posts, removing
> threads, and banning users for posting the link.
This is a misleading oversimplification. FreeBSD-the-project doesn't
control or have any moderation privileges on BSD-topic subreddits.
The only active moderator on one of the subreddits (freebsd) isn't
even a developer, just some random reddit user who happened to
register long ago. Colin Percival happens to have moderation
privileges on the other subreddit (BSD), but again, is acting on his
personal volition. He does not sit on nor represent the Core team.
Most discussions on the code of conduct in both locations have been
left in place, despite fairly low quality discussion. (The usual
name-calling, spreading of outright FUD, othering, etc etc.)
The few posts that have been removed were outright, low-effort
trolling. Not any kind of nuanced criticism of the actual code of
Note that links to discussion on the BSD subreddits have been shared
in high drama, non-technical subreddits like r/Drama,
r/KotakuInAction, and r/SJWHate, likely leading to an influx of users
from those other spaces.
> Colin Percival is among the mods doing the removal.
Colin can speak to what has been moderated. Removed subjects and
comments are still easily discovered on reddit archive sites, e.g.,
https://ceddit.com/r/BSD . You can judge whether anything of value
was lost. (I think not, but that's just my opinion.)
Clearly, discussion has not been eliminated. There's tons of active
"discussion" going on. I don't think it's particularly valuable
discourse because the same misrepresentations and outright falsehoods
are repeated over and over again, but it certainly hasn't been
scrubbed clean by moderators (who are mostly not under control of the
project anyway). What has been moderated is largely duplicate threads
trying to game reddit's post ordering system to get repeated
visibility, or low-effort trolling.
Please do not leak internal, private project emails.
freebsd-advocacy at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-advocacy