What sort of market does FreeBSD provide ... ?
Darren
freebsd at bitfreak.org
Mon Jul 24 05:26:41 UTC 2006
kevlar Hodge-Podge wrote:
> I just want to see if I understand the issue correctly.
>
>> From what it sounds like there would need to both be a server for all the
> individual machines to connect to, and some sort of scripted client to
> capture info on the machine and send it to the server. When asking about
> older machines such as the RELENG_4 mail server mentioned, wouldn’t that
> person have to go back and in stall this software on the machine? Also
> if this project were to work, it would almost have to be placed as a
> high priority install, if not almost mandatory. When and how often would
> the client contact the server? Every reboot would seem like a good time,
> but possibly more often. Would it be possible to modify a very thin
> email client to work as the client, meaning the server would send an
> email, and when received it would prompt you “would you like to send
> uptime/user data now?” perhaps even being able to choose what types of
> data to send. I think the average person would be more likely to send
> more info if they knew exactly what was being sent.
The outrage over the behavior and potential of WGA is a pretty good
meter of the general population's opinion of software "calling home."
More information about the freebsd-advocacy
mailing list