Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For?
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.org
Thu Feb 17 13:11:32 PST 2005
Sander Vesik wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs at berklix.org> wrote:
> > Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify. Let's
> > - Tell people to move to chat at freebsd.org.
> > - Report offenders to postmaster at freebsd.org for blocking.
> > - Request postmaster at freebsd.org appends to list definition:
> > "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go."
> > (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people
> > have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.)
> I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example,
> discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of
> what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example
> producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems
> or similar.
OK, fine. Could you (or someone else) please suggest exact words to
replace current http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
Furthering the Use of FreeBSD. Share ideas and plan to
increase the number of companies and individuals using FreeBSD.
Once a number of us back a tighter list definition, we can send
it to postmaster at freebsd.org to request it be the official list definition.
.. & then use it to tell windy people to go to chat@ or be blocked off list.
Julian Stacey Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
More information about the freebsd-advocacy