FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows
anderson at centtech.com
Mon Jun 23 10:36:30 PDT 2003
Johnson David wrote:
> On Saturday 21 June 2003 09:58 am, Dan Langille wrote:
>>It should also be comparing Windows XP, not Windows 2000. I don't
>>think we'd like it if they looking at FreeBSD 4.2...
> Win2K is still very widely used in the market segments where FreeBSD
> might be considered. Most of the points against Win2K also apply to
> WinXP, so maybe relabeling the column "Windows 2000/XP" is more
Actually, more appropriate would be Windows 2000 Advanced Server, right?
Windows XP is mainly for desktops, not servers..
More information about the freebsd-advocacy