kernels' weight
sektie
sektie at codersluts.net
Mon Jun 9 03:57:20 PDT 2003
> We know Linux is the son of the microkernel Minix. Linux kernel is
> simple and light, but its compilation is complicate, owing to the
> need of a lot of modules, and to the difference between several
> distributions. It is much easier to compile a FreeBSD kernel, even
> if it needs some megabyte more. If we can compress the kernel
> following the instruction on the Dossier books, who cares of its
> original weight?
Linux kernel simple and light? Are you a fan of the crackpipe? :P
The linux kernel is still decompressed when it gets loaded into memory.
There isn't really that much of a difference in size. What are you trying to
do? Save disk space? Dude, it's only a few MB.
Randi
sektie at codersluts.net
http://perlpimp.codersluts.net/
More information about the freebsd-advocacy
mailing list