uptime 4.0
Eric Anderson
anderson at centtech.com
Wed Dec 3 06:03:30 PST 2003
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
> Todays internet is to hostile for systems that isnt frequently and
> regularly patched and maintained.
Just curious, but, has anyone ever heard of a firewall? I typically
don't let my machines be accessed from the internet, and I don't run
services on an box that isn't needed. I'm just saying that there are
levels of security - any machine touching the net (we all agree here)
should have the latest patches and updates, without a doubt. What about
a box that is internal, that doesn't allow local user logins, and/or
runs a minimal amount of services (say, httpd and sshd)? Of course,
those tools should be patched, and why not do the others too - but no
reboot is needed for a lot of patches.
I just think that "large uptime = bad admin" is a pretty shallow and
close minded way to stereotype people based on how long a machine has
been powered on without a reboot. Nobody said "1200 days without a
security patch! woohoo!"..
Anyway, this thread should probably move to -chat..
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
All generalizations are false, including this one.
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-advocacy
mailing list