ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron)

Mathieu Prevot mathieu_prevot at yahoo.fr
Thu Oct 27 14:39:46 PDT 2005


Le 21 oct. 05 à 19:43, Nate Lawson a écrit :

> John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Friday 21 October 2005 02:38 am, Mathieu Prevot wrote:
>>
>>>> I think that the generation of the OS for Amd64 needs to set this
>>>> define:
>>>>
>>>> #define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS
>>>>
>>>> I will look into doing this automatically in the actypes.h header
>>>>
>>>
>>> To confirm, the same output on the same system but with
>>> 6.0RC1i386GENERIC:
>>>
>> I think Robert's point is a patch like the following hack would  
>> shut up the warnings:
>> Index: actypes.h
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/actypes.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.1.1.29
>> diff -u -r1.1.1.29 actypes.h
>> --- actypes.h   1 Dec 2004 23:13:39 -0000       1.1.1.29
>> +++ actypes.h   21 Oct 2005 13:52:22 -0000
>> @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@
>>  typedef UINT64                          ACPI_SIZE;
>>  #define ALIGNED_ADDRESS_BOUNDARY        0x00000008      /* No  
>> hardware alignment support in IA64 */
>> +#ifdef __amd64__
>> +#define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS
>> +#endif
>>  #define ACPI_USE_NATIVE_DIVIDE                          /* Native  
>> 64-bit integer support */
>>  #define ACPI_MAX_PTR                    ACPI_UINT64_MAX
>>  #define ACPI_SIZE_MAX                   ACPI_UINT64_MAX
>> The problem is that currently the actypes.h header assumes that  
>> the only 64-bit platform it runs on is IA-64, but it also runs on  
>> amd64 and amd64 allows for unaligned accesses just like i386.
>> I'm not sure if ALIGNED_ADDRESS_BOUNDARY should be 0x4 for amd64  
>> either, probably not though.
>>
>
> If that works, can you commit it to something off the vendor  
> branch? (Perhaps acfreebsd.h or something?)
>
> -- 
> Nate

I simply added

#define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS

in /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/acpica_machdep.h so the intel actypes.h  
is preserved.
Maybe it is simpler than touching the Robert's / Intel's code. Is it  
right ?
If so, someone have to commit it on the CVS sources. Can you do it  
before the release ?

--MP





More information about the freebsd-acpi mailing list