git: 77e1ccbee3ed - main - rc: implement parallel boot

[Cy Schubert]

In message <38e603a7-6c04-38f0-2ab8-84dc4303a4e6 at freebsd.org>, Stefan Esser 
wri
tes:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
> --yUCpJEhUDPo8OlbsS3xTv1HUJiJy3RHm3
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="uL2uFaSH9IO96vdjjeafizosWGWwgD79v";
>  protected-headers="v1"
> From: Stefan Esser <se at freebsd.org>
> To: dev-commits-src-all at freebsd.org, src-committers at freebsd.org,
>  dev-commits-src-main at freebsd.org
> Cc: Chris Rees <crees at bayofrum.net>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org>,
>  Rick Parrish <unitrunker at gmail.com>, Cy Schubert
>  <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>, Alastair Hogge <agh at riseup.net>
> Message-ID: <38e603a7-6c04-38f0-2ab8-84dc4303a4e6 at freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: git: 77e1ccbee3ed - main - rc: implement parallel boot
> References: <202102231027.11NARYYE041280 at gitrepo.freebsd.org>
>  <6D4FCE07-B996-430C-8EA8-6CB37A6DEEE8 at bayofrum.net>
>  <74fde23ead6719ac4e56dacb51bca6ed at bayofrum.net>
>  <202103080716.1287GQWB055131 at slippy.cwsent.com>
>  <2ed29c1254d48c3724b944ba4a7d6f3c at riseup.net>
> In-Reply-To: <2ed29c1254d48c3724b944ba4a7d6f3c at riseup.net>
>
> --uL2uFaSH9IO96vdjjeafizosWGWwgD79v
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> Content-Language: en-US
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Am 08.03.21 um 10:44 schrieb Alastair Hogge:
> > On 2021-03-08 15:16, Cy Schubert wrote:
> >> In message <74fde23ead6719ac4e56dacb51bca6ed at bayofrum.net>, Chris Rees=
>
> >> writes:
> >>> Incidentally, is the plan for this to go into 13 *and* 12, or just 13=
> ?
> >>> It's an exciting step!
> >>
> >> If this does go into 13 or 12, it should be tested in -CURRENT for lon=
> ger
> >> than three weeks. Probably six weeks.
> >=20
> > mountd on my NAS fails to load because unbound (via ports) is not yet
> > responding to any name queries:
>
> SDDM fails to successfully start an X session now, too.
>
> It repeatedly tries to start the X server without success.
> Only a "service sddm restart" terminates this loop.
>
> I do assume that the same applies to quite a number of services
> that are installed form ports/packages.
>
> While we can test parallel execution of rc scripts in base, this
> is not easily possible for the large number of optional services
> provided by ports/packages.
>
> I'll try to find the cause of the start-up failure for the SDDM
> case on my system. But even if I get it fixed on my system, it
> may still fail to start the X server on systems with a different
> set of ports ...
>
> Regards, STefan

Is this new breakage after 763db589328 or before the fixes to this?


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org
NTP:           <cy at nwtime.org>    Web:  https://nwtime.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.