git: f3aa0098a82e - main - Use mtx_lock_spin in the gic driver

Andrew Turner andrew at fubar.geek.nz
Wed Sep 29 15:43:03 UTC 2021



> On 28 Sep 2021, at 16:36, Marcin Wojtas <mw at semihalf.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> wt., 28 wrz 2021 o 14:43 Andrew Turner <andrew at freebsd.org> napisał(a):
>> 
>> The branch main has been updated by andrew:
>> 
>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=f3aa0098a82ebf7712aa13716d794aa7e4ac59cd
>> 
>> commit f3aa0098a82ebf7712aa13716d794aa7e4ac59cd
>> Author:     Andrew Turner <andrew at FreeBSD.org>
>> AuthorDate: 2021-09-28 11:36:42 +0000
>> Commit:     Andrew Turner <andrew at FreeBSD.org>
>> CommitDate: 2021-09-28 11:42:06 +0000
>> 
>>    Use mtx_lock_spin in the gic driver
>> 
>>    The mutex was changed to a spin lock when the MSI/MSI-X handling was
>>    moved from the gicv2m to the gic driver. Update the calls to lock
>>    and unlock the mutex to the spin variant.
>> 
>>    Submitted by:   jrtc27 ("Change all the mtx_(un)lock(&sc->mutex) to be the _spin versions.")
>>    Reported by:    mw, antranigv at freebsd.am
>>    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
>> ---
>> sys/arm/arm/gic.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/sys/arm/arm/gic.c b/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
>> index d7edd7885404..89db4e324600 100644
>> --- a/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ arm_gic_alloc_msi(device_t dev, device_t child, int count, int maxcount,
>> 
>>        sc = device_get_softc(dev);
>> 
>> -       mtx_lock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_lock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>> 
>>        found = false;
>>        for (irq = sc->sc_spi_start; irq < sc->sc_spi_end; irq++) {
>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ arm_gic_alloc_msi(device_t dev, device_t child, int count, int maxcount,
>> 
>>        /* Not enough interrupts were found */
>>        if (!found || irq == sc->sc_spi_end) {
>> -               mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +               mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>>                return (ENXIO);
>>        }
>> 
>> @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ arm_gic_alloc_msi(device_t dev, device_t child, int count, int maxcount,
>>                /* Mark the interrupt as used */
>>                sc->gic_irqs[irq + i].gi_flags |= GI_FLAG_MSI_USED;
>>        }
>> -       mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>> 
>>        for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>>                srcs[i] = (struct intr_irqsrc *)&sc->gic_irqs[irq + i];
>> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ arm_gic_release_msi(device_t dev, device_t child, int count,
>> 
>>        sc = device_get_softc(dev);
>> 
>> -       mtx_lock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_lock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>>        for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>                gi = (struct gic_irqsrc *)isrc[i];
>> 
>> @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ arm_gic_release_msi(device_t dev, device_t child, int count,
>> 
>>                gi->gi_flags &= ~GI_FLAG_MSI_USED;
>>        }
>> -       mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>> 
>>        return (0);
>> }
>> @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ arm_gic_alloc_msix(device_t dev, device_t child, device_t *pic,
>> 
>>        sc = device_get_softc(dev);
>> 
>> -       mtx_lock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_lock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>>        /* Find an unused interrupt */
>>        for (irq = sc->sc_spi_start; irq < sc->sc_spi_end; irq++) {
>>                KASSERT((sc->gic_irqs[irq].gi_flags & GI_FLAG_MSI) != 0,
>> @@ -1152,13 +1152,13 @@ arm_gic_alloc_msix(device_t dev, device_t child, device_t *pic,
>>        }
>>        /* No free interrupt was found */
>>        if (irq == sc->sc_spi_end) {
>> -               mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +               mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>>                return (ENXIO);
>>        }
>> 
>>        /* Mark the interrupt as used */
>>        sc->gic_irqs[irq].gi_flags |= GI_FLAG_MSI_USED;
>> -       mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>> 
>>        *isrcp = (struct intr_irqsrc *)&sc->gic_irqs[irq];
>>        *pic = dev;
>> @@ -1178,9 +1178,9 @@ arm_gic_release_msix(device_t dev, device_t child, struct intr_irqsrc *isrc)
>>        KASSERT((gi->gi_flags & GI_FLAG_MSI_USED) == GI_FLAG_MSI_USED,
>>            ("%s: Trying to release an unused MSI-X interrupt", __func__));
>> 
>> -       mtx_lock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_lock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>>        gi->gi_flags &= ~GI_FLAG_MSI_USED;
>> -       mtx_unlock(&sc->mutex);
>> +       mtx_unlock_spin(&sc->mutex);
>> 
>>        return (0);
>> }
> 
> Thank you for the patch, it fixes the MSI-X in my setup, but in order
> to operate properly on Marvell SoCs (equipped with a standard GICv2m),
> I have to remove the asserts, which were added in c6f3076d4405 (Move
> the GICv2m msi handling to the parent):
> 
> diff --git a/sys/arm/arm/gic.c b/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
> index 89db4e324600..b5d72a2a6c49 100644
> --- a/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/sys/arm/arm/gic.c
> @@ -528,8 +528,6 @@ arm_gic_write_ivar(device_t dev, device_t child,
> int which, uintptr_t value)
>                 * GIC_IVAR_MBI_START must be set once and first. This allows
>                 * us to reserve the registers when GIC_IVAR_MBI_COUNT is set.
>                 */
> -               MPASS(sc->sc_spi_start == 0);
> -               MPASS(sc->sc_spi_count == 0);
>                MPASS(value >= GIC_FIRST_SPI);
>                MPASS(value < sc->nirqs);
> 
> @@ -537,7 +535,6 @@ arm_gic_write_ivar(device_t dev, device_t child,
> int which, uintptr_t value)
>                return (0);
>        case GIC_IVAR_MBI_COUNT:
>                MPASS(sc->sc_spi_start != 0);
> -               MPASS(sc->sc_spi_count == 0);
> 
>                sc->sc_spi_count = value;
>                sc->sc_spi_end = sc->sc_spi_start + sc->sc_spi_count;
> 
> Any thoughts?

Can you try the patch in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32224. The above change is to check there is only a single mbi range, however it appears your hardware has multiple gicv2m devices so will try to reserve multiple mbi ranges.

Andrew



More information about the dev-commits-src-all mailing list