cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add main.c pkg_add.1
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create main.c pkg_create.1
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete main.c pkg_delete.1
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info main.c pkg_info.1 ...
sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Wed Jun 4 19:30:40 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Quoting Steve Kargl, who wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:00:13AM -0700 ..
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:36:31AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > Quoting Steve Kargl, who wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:39:55PM -0700 ..
> > > >
> > > > I personally believe that commit should be backed out and core
> > > > should establish a policy against adding long options to BSD
> > >
> > > Gimme a break..
> > >
> > Note I wrote "I personally believe". You don't have to agree
> > with me.
> Well I indeed do not agree. Aren't the developers old enough
> to make this kind of judgement call themselves, without all sorts of written
Apparently, not. See the recent commit to pkg_create.
> I would think they all are!
Where do we stop? Should we add long options to all
/usr/bin utilities? Why stop at /usr/bin, let's add
long options to /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin, /rescue, etc.
More information about the cvs-src